A Satellite Navigation and Global Positioing Systems forum. Sat Nav Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Sat Nav Banter forum » GPS and Sat Nav Newsgroups » sci.geo.satellite-nav (Global Satellite Navigation)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

sci.geo.satellite-nav (Global Satellite Navigation) (sci.geo.satellite-nav) Discussion of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Topics include the technical aspects of GNSS operation, user experiences in the use of GNSS, information regarding GNSS products and discussion of GNSS policy (such as GPS selective availability).

Tags: , ,

Cheap but accurate surveying



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old September 1st 08, 05:30 PM posted to sci.geo.satellite-nav
Happy Trails
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 296
Default Cheap but accurate surveying

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 05:50:42 -0700 (PDT), Silvar Beitel
wrote:

Let me repeat a question I asked before, but was lost in other stuff.

What possible items would you want to do a rough location/elevation on
for a civil engineering project early on that you would do a more
exact location on later? Please bear in mind that you did mention
sewer elevations in a previous post in this thread.

Ads
  #32  
Old September 5th 08, 04:46 PM posted to sci.geo.satellite-nav
Ted
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Cheap but accurate surveying

Silvar Beitel wrote:

My brother the civil engineer asked me (the supposed family GPS
expert) about the following scenario (to help in developing initial
site plans without immediately having to go to expensive centimeter-
accurate surveying GPSs and/or bringing in and paying real surveyors,
which would come later on in the process):

Take a pair of cheap identical datalogging GPSs. Park one at a
reference point and let it sit there logging. Send cheapo employee
around with the other unit to the points of interest in the site.
Gather the two and dump out their logs. Match the timestamps, check
that both units used the same satellite set at the same times
(probable over a limited area, like a large construction site?), and
calculate all the relative offsets between the points of interest and
the reference. How accurate would those offsets be? Especially
altitudes (important for things like sewer lines)?

I'm guessing pretty accurate, like down to the resolution of the
units. Say 6 inches for a GPS that reported minutes with 5 digits to
the right of the decimal point.

Thoughts?

--
Silvar Beitel


Basically, it doesn't work. I was skeptical of what is talked about in
this link, but it is true....

http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/wire...9/two_gps.html

Also see:

http://www.gpspassion.com/forumsen/t...OPIC_ID=109246
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Sat Nav Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
British Article Directory - RealEstate - Car Credit - Free Myspace Layouts - Mortgage Loans