A Satellite Navigation and Global Positioing Systems forum. Sat Nav Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Sat Nav Banter forum » GPS and Sat Nav Newsgroups » sci.geo.satellite-nav (Global Satellite Navigation)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

sci.geo.satellite-nav (Global Satellite Navigation) (sci.geo.satellite-nav) Discussion of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Topics include the technical aspects of GNSS operation, user experiences in the use of GNSS, information regarding GNSS products and discussion of GNSS policy (such as GPS selective availability).

Tags: , , , , , ,

Air Force Polls Receiver Makers for Solutions to SatelliteProblems



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 2nd 09, 10:55 AM posted to sci.geo.satellite-nav,alt.satellite.gps
claudegps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 102
Default Air Force Polls Receiver Makers for Solutions to SatelliteProblems

On 1 Lug, 04:08, Sam Wormley wrote:
Air Force Polls Receiver Makers for Solutions to Satellite Problems
* *http://sidt.gpsworld.com/gpssidt/con....jsp?id=607645

Jun 30, 2009
GPS World

The U.S. Air Force GPS Wing seeks comments from receiver manufacturers regarding the
SVN-49 signal anomaly and the Air Force’s proposed solution. The Air Force has been
investigating the cause and effects of signal distortions, observed as an
elevation-dependent bias in ranging measurements, from the GPS IIR-20(M) spacecraft
launched on March 24, 2009 and not yet set operational. As recently as June 19, the GPS
Wing outlined solutions it planned to implement to compensate for the pseudorange errors,
but now it states that “it is not possible for the Air Force to evaluate the myriad of
civilian products and applications. Your help is urgently requested to […] evaluate […],
conduct tests […], and provide recommendations and advice to the Air Force.”


I wonder which problems may rise for Ephemeris Extension solutions.
The computation of client-based or server-based long term ephemeris
maybe affected by the fix of the problem.
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2010 Sat Nav Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Turquoise Rings - Find jobs - Free Online Greeting Cards : Meme4u - Credit Consolidation - Millsberry