![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
sci.geo.satellite-nav (Global Satellite Navigation) (sci.geo.satellite-nav) Discussion of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Topics include the technical aspects of GNSS operation, user experiences in the use of GNSS, information regarding GNSS products and discussion of GNSS policy (such as GPS selective availability). |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm curious as to the EXACT DoD restriction on civilian GPS units
regarding speed and altitude. I'm aware that the restrictions are for speeds 1000kts AND altitudes 60,000 ft. However, I've heard conflicting information that the 1000kts speed restriction only applies to the horizontal direction (ex. a rocket going straight up at 1400kts and 70,000 ft might not be restricted). This would make sense if the primary purpose of the units is to prevent foreign governments or "groups of malcontent" from using civilian GPS units in their own missile technology, which would require a higher groundspeed velocity to strike other targets. Thanks in advance for any insight! Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Harper wrote:
I'm curious as to the EXACT DoD restriction on civilian GPS units regarding speed and altitude. I'm aware that the restrictions are for speeds 1000kts AND altitudes 60,000 ft. However, I've heard conflicting information that the 1000kts speed restriction only applies to the horizontal direction (ex. a rocket going straight up at 1400kts and 70,000 ft might not be restricted). This would make sense if the primary purpose of the units is to prevent foreign governments or "groups of malcontent" from using civilian GPS units in their own missile technology, which would require a higher groundspeed velocity to strike other targets. Thanks in advance for any insight! Dave The velocity restriction is 3D limiting use for military weapons. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sam Wormley wrote:
The velocity restriction is 3D limiting use for military weapons. Is this not easily gotten around by buying from sources not under the control of the US government? Does not one assume that our enemies have suitable chips, and that the larger enemies have full use of the military capabilities of the system, easily obtained by the spies which we know pervade our military? Doug McDonald |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug McDonald wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote: The velocity restriction is 3D limiting use for military weapons. Is this not easily gotten around by buying from sources not under the control of the US government? Does not one assume that our enemies have suitable chips, and that the larger enemies have full use of the military capabilities of the system, easily obtained by the spies which we know pervade our military? Doug McDonald And anybody can make their own GPS receivers... Selling those capable chips away is not in the best interest of the US military. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sam Wormley wrote:
\ Does not one assume that our enemies have suitable chips, and that the larger enemies have full use of the military capabilities of the system, easily obtained by the spies which we know pervade our military? Doug McDonald And anybody can make their own GPS receivers... Selling those capable chips away is not in the best interest of the US military. You post is not parseable. What I am saying is that any "significant" enemy such as Russia, China, India, France, etc., perhaps Pakistan, would have spies who would get either the plans or specs or sample of military capable chips, which would then be locally made. Doug McDonald |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sam Wormley wrote in message news:nDg2d.59739$D%[email protected]_s51...
The velocity restriction is 3D limiting use for military weapons. That's what I originally THOUGHT, but I contacted Garmin about the DoD restriction about reaquisition time after exceeding the DoD limitation on speed over 60k ft (and then slowing down). I was given the following reply: "The restriction (imposed by the DOD) of horizontal velocity over 60,000 feet will take effect. There will be no position reporting during that power cycle." I noted the word 'horizontal'. So I says: "If I understand your answer correctly, I could be at 120,000ft with a vertical velocity of 1100kts and a horizontal velocity of 200kts, and the GPS unit would still output position data, and would be free of the DoD restriction. Is this statement correct?" And him says: "Sir, as I asked the OEM sales Rep. As he described it, it was only for horizontal velocity. He did not indicate the same for vertical velocity. I will try to get in touch with him again. I do believe your statement to be correct. Let me make sure that I understood the restriction correctly." And after a day, I get confirmation. He spoketh: "Sir, the answer is that vertical velocity does not apply. GPS main function is for horizontal velocity." So I'm wondering if it is a common misconception that the velocity restriction is 3D, or if the guy at Garmin was smoking crack...? Dave |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just curious, did you ask how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug McDonald wrote in message ...
Sam Wormley wrote: Does not one assume that our enemies have suitable chips, and that the larger enemies have full use of the military capabilities of the system, easily obtained by the spies which we know pervade our military? Doug McDonald And anybody can make their own GPS receivers... Selling those capable chips away is not in the best interest of the US military. You post is not parseable. Check you ![]() What I am saying is that any "significant" enemy such as Russia, China, India, France, etc., perhaps Pakistan, would have spies who would get either the plans or specs or sample of military capable chips, which would then be locally made. Doug McDonald There's more to PPS than just having the chip/spec. You're reaching. Regards, Jon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|